| Abstract: | 近年來國際對於性別議題的重視，臺灣也積極參與其中，2003年開始引用性別主流化為最高性別平等概念外，也在2011年通過「消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約」(CEDAW)國內施行法。雖在政府與民間團體的共同努力下，臺灣在國際性別評比指標亞洲區拿下好成績，但，刻板化的傳統，忽視社會結構造成對女性的性別壓迫，這也讓女性的經濟資源取得不易，進而影響到女性個人權力的取得。 公務人員是以性別主流化檢視國家制定重要政策與法律的關鍵人物，勞政與社政人員也是傳達女性經濟、就業福利政策的重要橋梁，在性別盲(gender-blind)的影響之下，更應有系統地培育公務人員成為性別主流專家與種子人力，藉由性別主流化的概念去改變公務體系文化，達到性別平等的目標。為此目標，政府推行許多相關訓練課程，研究認為者這些相關的經驗，有無改變公務員的態度，還是流於虛應故事，或不必然成為實質的影響，有從事實證研究之必要。 本研究採量化研究方法，以中部地區五個縣市的勞政、社政人員為研究對象。共發出366份問卷，回收297份，有效問卷295份。經過分析後，得到以下結論：1. 在性別主流化的相關經驗上，社政人員有78％，勞政人員僅38％有受過相關訓練課程。兩方在對於CEDAW經濟就業條文中夫妻財產構面上，也有明顯態度上的差異。2. 在CEDAW的相關經驗上，社政人員接受過相關訓練課程的有49％，而勞政人員僅有15％，這樣的差距並未反映在CEDAW的知識題中，但差距出現在態度構面中的夫妻財產獨立上。3. 只有在執行過性別主流化相關方案的，會影響對於CEDAW中性別工作的態度，其餘的相關經驗對CEDAW的態度並無影響。4. 基層人員與社工師性別主流化與CEDAW的經驗多於中高階主管，一年以內與三年以上CEDAW的相關經驗均都高於一至三年。根據以上研究結果所做的研究建議如下：1. 對勞社政單位的建議：增加相關課程學習2. 對政府單位的建議：增加課程前後測3. 對未來研究者建議：可以民間單位為研究對象、運用質性研究調查、增加研究變項
In recent years, it increase the international attention on the gender issues. Taiwan is also actively involved in this. Taiwan is not only started to apply gender mainstreaming to be the highest concept, but also passed the domestic implemental law of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) in 2011. Although it seems that Taiwan scored good results in World’s Women Trends and Statistics in Asia because of the efforts of the government and the civil society, the female still face the gender oppression under invisible social structure which is affected by the stereotypes of tradition. This also allows women difficult to obtain economic resources, and affecting women to obtain their individual rights.Civil bureaucrats are the key figures to examine the national important policy making and law by gender mainstreaming. Besides, labor and social affairs officers are also the important bridge to express women’s economic and job welfare policy. Due to the influence of gender-blind, it should be educate more civil bureaucrats into an expert on gender mainstreaming systematically, and then in order to reach the goal of equality, it should try to change the culture of public bureaucrats system with the concept of gender mainstreaming. For this goal, the government already implements a number of related training courses. However, those efforts do change the attitude of civil bureaucrats or not, or do not necessarily become a real impact, there is need to engage in empirical research.This study conducted quantitative research methods. And the study objects are the association of labor and association of social welfare in the center region, around five countries of Taiwan. I issued total 366 questionnaires, and 297 returns, and there are 295 valid questionnaires. After analysis, the following conclusions:1. On gender mainstreaming experience, social officers have 78%, only 38% of labor officers have received relevant training courses, there are significant attitudinal differences on the couple property of the economy and employment article of CEDAW.2. On the relevant experience of CEDAW, social officers have 49% who had received relevant training courses, while only 15% of the labor officers, this gap without reflect in the knowledge test of CEDAW. But this gap show up on the attitude of the couple property independence issues.3. The only program experience can affect the attitude of the CEDAW gender work is he who had conducted gender mainstreaming related proposals, the other experiences who has doesn’t affect the person’s attitude to CEDAW.4. The junior officers and social workers have more experience on the gender mainstreaming and CEDAW than the senior executives. Even the junior officers they work less than one year and someone who have more than three years of relevant experience of CEDAW, they are more experience than their senior executives around one to three years.Based on the results of the above studies, I made the following recommendations:1. Recommendations for Labor and Social units: they should increase some related CEDAW courses.2. Recommendations for government: they should increase pre-test and post-test courses; it might be good for some research in the future.3. Recommendations for the later researchers: they can take the social units as the study object and use qualitative research surveys to do the research. Plus, they can increase some research variables as well. |
