English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 21921/27947 (78%)
Visitors : 4242554      Online Users : 786
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://140.128.103.80:8080/handle/310901/28472


    Title: 公私協力模式推動社區總體營造之研究:以臺中市大安區海墘社區為例
    Other Titles: The Study on Public-Private Partnership to Promote the Community Holistic Construction : A Case of Hai-Chian Community , Da’an District , Taichung City
    Authors: 柳碧慧
    LIU,PI-HUI
    Contributors: 李宗勳
    LI,TZUNG-SHIUN
    公共事務碩士在職專班
    Keywords: 公私協力;社區總體營造;海墘社區
    Public-Private Partnership;Comprehensive Community Development;Hai-Chian Community
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-10-20T07:49:01Z (UTC)
    Abstract: 本研究以公私協力理論作為檢視基礎,以臺中市大安區海墘社區推動各項社區營造過程為個案,探究社區發展協會與公部門在社區營造工作上如何互動,公部門的政策引導、政策指揮對社區是一盞明燈?還是讓社區失去自我創造之能力? 本研究整理出公私協力的理論基礎內涵有:共享權威、資源整合、互動關係模式、資訊與溝通、課責與信任等。又於文獻回顧中瞭解社區總體營造成功與否,不外乎與幾個探討議題有關:社區營造意識、社區居民參與度、專家學者角色定位、資源自主程度、跨部門合作程度等。本研究即以此五大公私協力理論基礎內涵及五大社區總體營造探討議題,建立本研究架構及訪談題綱內容方向。本研究主要研究發現有以下幾點:(1)社區營造意識與互動關係 : 社區需要充權,「由下而上」與「由上而下」是可以相互搭配的。(2)社區居民參與度與資訊及溝通 : 社區意見領袖,仍主導著社區營造的方向。(3)專家學者角色定位與共享權威 : 定位清楚係陪伴角色,互相尊重,共享權威。(4)資源自主程度與資源整合 : 優質的人力,是社區最大的資源。(5)跨部門合作程度與課責及信任 : 公部門與社區於社區營造推動上係合作的,而政府內部各部門間,因各權責業務不同,分工多,合作少。文中並提出淺薄的幾點建議如下:(1)輔導團隊有存在之必要性,專家學者應偏重實務型專家。(2)強化委外輔導團隊功能,增列輔導團隊得依社區實際需求,提專案輔導計畫。(3)政府補助專任人力,法令可再鬆綁、經費薪資可再提高。(4)強化區公所在社區總體營造權能,輔導陪伴停滯型、起步型、潛力型社區。
    Taking the theory of public-private partnership as its basis for inspection, this research analyzes a case study on the process of community development promoted by Hai-Chian Community in Da-An District of Taichung City. This study aims to delve into interactions between the community development association and public sectors in tasks with regard to community development to find out if the public sector’s policy guidance and directions is the light or the loss for the ability for self-creation for a community?This study probes into the theoretical basis and connotation for public-private partnership, shared authority, resource integration, interaction relationship model, information and communication, and accountability and trust. The literature reviews will lead people to gain insights into issues about the success of comprehensive community development: community development and awareness, community residents’ participation, role positioning of experts and scholars, level of resource autonomy, and cross-sector cooperation level. This study applies theoretical foundation and connotation of these five public-private partnership and five issues of comprehensive community development to building the research framework and setting the direction for interview summary.Research findings of this study are: (1) Community development and awareness and interaction relationship: community requires empowerment, and bottom-up and top-down are mutually exclusive alternatives for community development. (2) Community residents’ participation and information and communication: community opinion leaders still play guiding roles in the direction for community development. (3) Role definition and shared authority of experts and scholars: a clear definition is an accompanying role, mutual respect and shared authority. (4) Level of resource autonomy and resource integration: quality manpower is a main resource for a community. (5) The process of cross-sector cooperation and accountability and trust: public sectors and communities are cooperative in the promotion of community development, while different government sectors exercise the diverse authorities and responsibilities that see more division of labor but with less cooperation. This study also put forwards suggestions given below: (1) There is a need for the existence of consultation team, and experts and scholars should one-sidedly emphasize pragmatic experts. (2) Enhance functions of outsourcing consultation teams, the increase of consultation teams will be based on the actual needs of communities, and put forth consulting projects. (3) The government supplements the manpower needs, eases up on its laws and decrees, and increases expenditures and wages. (4) Enhance the authorities and functions of district offices in carrying out effective comprehensive community development to consult and accompany communities which stay in a stagnant, a beginning stage or a potential stage.
    Appears in Collections:[公共事務碩士在職專班] 碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    104THU01636025-001.pdf3535KbAdobe PDF777View/Open


    All items in THUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    本網站之東海大學機構典藏數位內容,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback