Tunghai University Institutional Repository:Item 310901/31132
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 21921/27947 (78%)
Visitors : 4217636      Online Users : 420
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://140.128.103.80:8080/handle/310901/31132


    Title: 戰後台灣的食狗現象(1949-2017)
    Other Titles: The phenomenon of dog eating in Taiwan after war (1949-2017)
    Authors: 蕭宏州
    Contributors: 王政文
    歷史學系
    Keywords: 狗肉;動物保護;社會問題;1960年禁令
    dog meat;animal protection;social problems;1960 ban
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2019-01-10T09:09:31Z (UTC)
    Abstract: 本文擬探討戰後台灣的食狗現象。主要使用政府文件與報紙,搭配日記、回憶錄、小說與相關文章進行研究。本文除緒論與結論外,分為三個部份。首先考察清代與日治時期的漢人食狗情況,接著探討主要的食用主群為何?引發了什麼様的社會問題?以及1960年,為何台灣省政府要公布禁止公開販賣狗肉的禁令?其次,在台灣省政府公布禁令後,食狗現象仍存在於台灣,為何禁令無法有效禁止狗肉於市場上流通?輿論又是如何看待這件事情?在沒有合法屠宰場與衛生檢驗的情況下,狗肉的來源為何?衛生問題又該如何處理?以及究竟狗肉有何特殊的吸引力?最後,解嚴後,民間的動物保護團體陸續成立,他們又是如何介入台灣的食狗現象?《動物保護法》立法與修法過程中的討論又是如何?本文並不是要批判食狗行為,或是解決狗肉能不能食用的難題。而是期望能彌補目前台灣學術界探討戰後台灣食狗現象文章的不足,讓國人對於此事能有更確切的瞭解與認知。藉由理解台灣食狗現象的歷史過程,提供與此事有關的議題(例如:動物保護、動物權益、人與動物關係)更廣泛全面的思考與助益。協助動物保護的推動。
    The thesis intends to explore the phenomenon of dog eating in Taiwan after war. It mainly USES government documents and newspapers, and studies them with diaries, memoirs, novels and related articles. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the thesis is divided into three parts. First of all, the thesis investigates the dog eating situation of the Han Chinese in qing dynasty and Japan, and then discusses the main food groups. What kind of social problems have arisen? And in 1960, why did the provincial government publish a ban on the public sale of dog meat? Secondly, after the Taiwan provincial government announced the ban, the phenomenon of dog eating still exists in Taiwan. Why can't the ban effectively ban dog meat from circulating in the market? How does public opinion look at this? What is the source of dog meat without legal slaughterhouses and health checks? What about health issues? And what is the special attraction of dog meat? In the end, after the crackdown, the civil society of animal protection was established, and how did they get involved in Taiwan's dog eating phenomenon? What is the discussion about the legislation and revision of the animal protection law?The thesis is not to criticize the behavior of dog eating, or to solve the tough problem that dog meat can be eaten or not. It is expected to make up for the lack of articles on the phenomenon of dog eating in Taiwan after war, so that people can have a more accurate understanding of this matter. The historical process of understanding the phenomenon of dog eating in Taiwan provides more comprehensive and thinking and help on issues related to this issue (e.g., animal protection, animal rights, human and animal relations). Assists in animal protection.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of History ] Theses and Dissertations

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    106THU00493002-001.pdf8525KbAdobe PDF2870View/Open


    All items in THUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    本網站之東海大學機構典藏數位內容,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback