Tunghai University Institutional Repository:Item 310901/31342
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 21921/27947 (78%)
Visitors : 4217702      Online Users : 472
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://140.128.103.80:8080/handle/310901/31342


    Title: 當代讀經教育理論與模式的探討--以中國大陸现况为例
    Other Titles: Discussion on the Theory and Mode of Contemporary Classic Reading Education -- a Case Study of Mainland China
    Authors: 洪圍閎
    HUNG,WEI-HUNG
    Contributors: 許建崑
    中國文學系碩士在職專班
    Keywords: 讀經;傳統文化;王財貴;書院;當代讀經教育
    reading classics;traditional culture;Wang Caigui;academy of classical learning;contemporary classical education
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-03-21T08:58:22Z (UTC)
    Abstract: 摘 要近年來讀經活動的推廣相當普及,不論在臺灣、大陸、香港,乃至全球華人圈,到處有大大小小或官方或私人的國學院、私塾、培訓機構等。讀經從臺灣發芽,而後大陸興起了國學復興運動,讀經的重心已經逐漸轉移到了中國大陸。臺灣的讀經模式已經趨於穩定,並逐漸顯示出不同的特色,而中國大陸的模式尚在蓬勃發展與開發探索的狀態中,既出現了一些亂象,也積累了一些寶貴的探索經驗。本文以此為研究切入點,首先探討當代經典教育在大陸的推廣狀況,分析中國大陸國學熱的興起背景,並梳理出臺灣和大陸具有代表性的讀經流派的主張,對比其異同。其次,回到對古代教育的研究,分析宋、明書院為代表的書院教育模式,在此基礎上結合筆者的教學經歷以及學者們對讀經教育的研究,對比古今書院的異同,探討當代書院復興傳統的利弊與可行性。最後,本文試圖結合當今教育與古代書院教育的經驗,以及當代優秀學者們的實踐成果,指出當代以讀經模式為主的經典教育的弊端,並試圖探討出適合當代經典教育的做法,形成官方扶持、學者引導、體制內與體制外良好互動的局面,共同引導經典教育與現代社會的良性結合。關鍵詞:讀經 傳統文化 王財貴 書院 當代經典教育
    AbstractIn recent years, the promotion of Chinese classic reading activities has been quite popular. No matter in Taiwan, mainland China, Hong Kong, or even in the global Chinese circle, there are large and small official or traditional Chinese culture schools, private schools, training institutions and so on. The focus of Chinese classic reading has shifted to mainland China, where it sprouted from Taiwan and the revival of sinology took place. Taiwan's model of Chinese classic reading has tended to be stable and is gradually showing different characteristics, while China's model is still in a state of vigorous development, development and exploration.Taking this as the research entry point, this paper first discusses the promotion of contemporary classical education in the mainland, analyzes the background of the rise of sinology craze in the mainland of China, and sorts out the propositions of representative schools of classics reading in Taiwan and the mainland to compare their similarities and differences.Secondly, it goes back to the research on ancient education, analyzes the education mode of academies represented by song and Ming academies, combines the author's teaching experience and scholars' research on Chinese classic reading education, compares the similarities and differences between ancient and modern academies, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages and feasibility of reviving the tradition of contemporary academies.Finally, this article tries to combine the modern education and experience of ancient academy education, and the practice of the contemporary outstanding scholars, points out that contemporary the disadvantages of classical education is given priority to with reading mode, and tries to explore a suitable for the practice of contemporary classical education, form the official support, scholars to guide a good interactive situation, system inside and outside the system, common guide benign combination of classical education and modern society.Keywords: reading classics, traditional culture, Wang Caigui, academy of classical learning, contemporary classical education
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Program in Chinese Literature for Professionals] Master's Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    107THU01045002-001.pdf4090KbAdobe PDF1312View/Open


    All items in THUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    本網站之東海大學機構典藏數位內容,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback