English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 21921/27947 (78%)
Visitors : 4203176      Online Users : 537
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://140.128.103.80:8080/handle/310901/31664


    Title: 價值投資策略與基本面指標獲利性之研究
    Other Titles: The Profitability of Value Investing Strategy and Fundamental Indicators
    Authors: 廖啟旻
    LIAO,CHI-MIN
    Contributors: 姜自強;張永和
    CHIANG,TZU-CHIANG;CHANG,YUNG-HO
    財務金融學系
    Keywords: 價值投資策略;基本面指標;F-SCORE
    Value investing strategy;Fundamental indicators;F-SCORE
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-12-16T04:05:52Z (UTC)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討如何運用基本面指標進行選股並搭配擇時的股價淨值比、股價營收比、本益比之價值投資策略,將不同基本面分組及不同價值投資策略間進行比較,檢視投資績效是否存在顯著差異。以台灣上市公司為研究樣本,排除2013年以後首次公開發行(IPO)之公司共750家,使用Piotroski(2000)提出之基本面指標F-SCORE進行分組,與過去不同的是本文以連續三年(2010年到2012年)F-SCORE皆大於中位數為連續高分組、連續三年F-SCORE皆在中位數以下為連續低分組,檢驗擇時的價值投資策略於基本面投資組合形成後五年(2013年3月底到2019年2月底)的績效表現。實證結果發現(1)連續高分組的報酬表現優於連續低分組亦優於普通公司、普通公司的報酬表現優於連續低分組,證實F-SCORE的長期分組效果。(2)股價淨值比策略及股價營收比策略報酬表現優於買進持有,惟本益比策略無法優於買進持有。(3)股價淨值比策略報酬表現優於股價營收比策略,惟在連續高分組中無顯著差異;股價淨值比策略及股價營收比報酬表現均優於本益比策略。(4)經風險調整後的報酬率 Mean/ S.D以連續高分組搭配股價淨值比策略達117.39%表現最佳。故建議投資人可將資金配置於F-SCORE連續高分組的股票、並搭配股價淨值比或股價營收比策略擇時進出,其中又以股價淨值比策略報酬表現更為優異。
    This paper examines the profitability of value investing strategy (Using the P/B ratio, the P/S ratio, and the P/E ratio of timing value investment strategy) and the fundamental indicators for stock selection. We analyze and compare different fundamental groups and different value investment strategies to see if there is a significant difference in investment performance. In addition, we adopt Piotroski (2000)’s F-SCORE but with the three consecutive years instead of one year to identify companies which belong to high score group, low score group or medium group. Besides, examining the value-based investment strategy of the timing of the five years after the formation of the portfolio. Using Taiwan-listed company data from 2013/03/31 to 2019/02/28, we find some interesting results: (1). The high score group has the best performance followed by medium group and the low score group has the lowest return. This confirms the long-term grouping effect of F-SCORE. (2). P/B ratio and P/S ratio strategy are better than the buy and hold strategy when selecting stocks, but the P/E strategy is not. (3). The return of P/B ratio strategy is better than the return of P/S ratio strategy but there is no significant difference in the high score group. Moreover, the return of P/B ratio strategy and P/S ratio strategy are significantly better than the return of P/E ratio strategy. (4). The risk-adjusted rate of return (Mean/S.D) of the high score group with using P/B ratio strategy is the highest, 117.39%. Therefore, this paper suggests that investors can simultaneously use F-score high score group stocks when selecting portfolio and the P/B ratio or P/S ratio strategy to enter and exit.
    Appears in Collections:[財務金融學系所] 碩士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    107THU00304005-001.pdf1182KbAdobe PDF37View/Open


    All items in THUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    本網站之東海大學機構典藏數位內容,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback