| Abstract: | 隨者身心障礙人數的逐年增加，政府對於身心障礙福利政策，主要多集中於協助就業、安定生活及醫療照護的服務，但是身心障礙者的社會福利照顧，不只於基本生活與工作就業，更應加強重建其身心健康，增加與社會之互動。因此，政府在大力推動全民運動，包含身心障礙者參與體育運動，並與非營利組織協力推展身心障礙體育運動，進而落實政府的身障體育政策之執行。惟長久以來，對於推展身心障礙體育運動的議題，無論在社會的層面或是相關學術研究上，迄今是較少被關注與討論。本研究之目的探討台中市身障體育總會與台中市運動局協力推展身障體育運動之情形，透過歸納整理政府與非營利組織協力模式之相關理論、運用文獻資料分析及深度訪談的方法，探討影響協力模式之要素及協力類型。本研究採以個案研究，由四個協力領域探討，包括共同目標、參與關係、資源互動及規範制度，研究結果發現協力互動之核心特色：第一是公私部門協力服務內容為「共同舉辦」型態，雙方呈現高度互賴及特殊對等之關係；第二為「組織類型」和「業務性質」影響協力的重要因素，包含角色認知、溝通機制及政府監督；第三係法源依據為非營利組織的經費來源；第四則協力過程雙方面臨困境與問題，非營利組織包括：(一)缺乏動力與競爭力；(二)組織營運發展受限；(三)協力目標差異性，公部門包括：(一)資源運用不完善；(二)人力不足與經費有限；(三)規範制度僵化。從研究發現提出建議，非營利組織方面：建立跨組織協力、發展營運策略、強化組織服務內涵，以及公部門方面：放寛規範制度、統籌資源運用共效、專業權責的角色，冀期對於推展身障體育運動提出不同的研究領域及價值。
As the number of persons with disabilities increases every year, the government’s welfare policies mainly focus on job placement, life assistance, and medical healthcare. However, the welfare and care provided to disabled people should not be limited to basics of livelihood and employment. More importantly, it is necessary to emphasize mental and physical wellbeing and promote their interactions with society. Therefore, the government promotes sports for all, including encouraging persons with disabilities to participate in sports activities and sports for persons with disabilities, working in collaboration with Nonprofit Organizations (NPOs) in order to consolidate the implementation of the government’s sports policies. However, for a prolonged period, the welfare issues in promoting sports for persons with disabilities has not received much attention in society or in related academic studies. The purpose of this study is to examine the conditions of the promotion of sports for persons with disabilities through the partnership between the Sports Bureau of Taichung City Government and Taichung Sports Federation for Individuals with Disabilities. Consulting related theory regarding the partnership patterns of the government and NGOs; it employs literature review and in-depth interviews to find out the affecting factors of partnership models and partnership types.Employing case studies, this research examines four partnership domains, including common goals, participation relationships, resource interactions, and rules and systems. The research discovered the core features of the partnership’s interactions: first, the content of the public-private partnership is “co-sponsorship.” A pattern that requires both parties forms a highly interdependent and special-equal relationship. Second, there was an “organization type” and “nature of service” They were the major affecting factors of the partnership, including role cognition, communication mechanisms, and government supervision. Third, according to legal sources, it provides NPOs with sources of income. Fourth, there were the difficulties and problems formed in the partnership process. For NPOs: (1) Lack of energy and competitiveness. (2) Limited development for the organization’s operation. (3) Differences in the goals of the partnership. For public departments: (1) Dissatisfactory use of resources; (2) Insufficient human resources and limited funds; (3) Inflexible rules and systems. From the findings in this study, it suggests the following: For NPOs, establish cross-organization partnerships, develop operational strategies, and promote organization and service contents. For public departments: Loosen the rules and systems, integrate resource utilization for maximum co-benefits, and professional roles with responsibilities. It is expected that it proposes different area of studies and values regarding the promotion of sports for persons with disabilities. |
