跨領域合作式設計團隊之概念思考脈絡研究—以加入社會系成員為例

Tunghai University Institutional Repository > 創意設計暨藝術學院 > 工業設計學系所 > 碩士論文 > Item 310901/379

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://140.128.103.80:8080/handle/310901/379

Title:	跨領域合作式設計團隊之概念思考脈絡研究—以加入社會系成員為例
Other Titles:	The Concept Thinking Context of Interdisciplinary Design Team — a Case Study of joining Members in Sociology Department
Authors:	黃冠萍 Huang, Kuan-Ping
Contributors:	李俐慧 Lee, Li-Hui 東海大學工業設計學系
Keywords:	跨領域;社會設計;設計團隊;概念;思考脈絡 Interdisciplinary;Design for Society;Design Team;Concept;Thinking Context
Date:	2010
Issue Date:	2011-01-03T05:03:18Z (UTC)
Abstract:	現代社會生活型態多樣而複雜造成產品需求複合化，導致產品開發過程需要整合應用不同領域知識。但是現今跨領域合作被運用於開發過程的效果評價不一。本研究肯定跨領域激盪的價值並認同工業設計的社會關懷，主張社會學領域與設計領域合作對社會設計的重要性。跨領域成效不彰可能是思考脈絡不同造成溝通無法順利進行。故本研究於產品概念發展階段，將社會系成員加入跨領域設計團隊共同討論產品概念，以得知加入社會系成員的跨領域設計團隊思考脈絡特性，並探討其思考內容是否更具社會性，期待做為日後探求較佳社會設計方法途徑之基礎研究。研究假設如果在產品概念思考階段加入社會系成員參與設計團隊，討論內容將可能有更多產品與社會交互關係之思考。研究方法採用實驗研究法，實驗組為加入社會系學生之設計團隊，對照組為工設系學生設計團隊。實驗過程中讓兩團隊分別針對「與『高齡者的快樂』有關的社會議題」進行概念發想，分析得出跨社會學領域合作式設計團隊之思考脈絡與特性。本研究歸納出加入社會系成員之跨領域設計團隊其概念思考脈絡特性如下：1. 思考脈絡方面：加入社會系成員之跨領域團隊討論問題內容較深入但面向不夠廣泛。另外，非設計系成員對產品開發過程不熟悉，因此工設系成員將團隊討論導引回題目主軸的能力非常重要，否則易形成無效溝通。2. 思考觀點方面：加入社會系成員之跨領域設計團隊偏向從社會因素解釋人的心理、生理狀態。而單一領域設計團隊偏向從個人生理、心理特性瞭解使用族群，因此顯示跨領域合作可以打破專業領域既定的思維模式或框架，使解決問題的可能性變得更廣闊。3. 互動溝通方面：跨領域團隊雙方在「生理」、「心理」、「使用者」等專業性質相近之合作較易獲得良好互動與回應，成為較具實質意義的討論。未來相關研究可以此為基礎，繼續探討更多關於概念整合型之跨領域設計團隊溝通互動議題，使設計創新的途徑能更多元豐富。 Variable and complicated lifestyle in modern society causes the product demand become compound. It also results in the needs of integrating and applying interdisciplinary knowledge in product development process. Nowadays, the outcome evaluation of applying interdisciplinary knowledge in the development process is discordant. This research confirms the value of interdisciplinary collaboration, agrees with adding society concern in industrial design, and claims the importance of cooperation between sociology and industrial design for social design.The reason of bad result from interdisciplinary cooperation may be caused by different thinking contexts which blocks in communication. Therefore, this research adds the sociology department members into a interdisciplinary design team to discuss product concept together. This method helps to identify the characteristics of thinking context that a interdisciplinary design team with sociology department members has. In addition, this study tries to figure out if there are more sociology viewpoints in the thinking context. The research results are expected to become a basic research methodology of society design for further studies in the future.The research assumption of this study is that there would be more thinking of relations between products and society in discussion content if there were sociology department members join into the design teams. This study applies Experimental Research Method. The experimental group is the design team which owns students of sociology and industrial design departments together. The control group is the design team with students from industrial design department only. In the experiment process, two groups develop concepts based on the social issue about “elder’s happiness” separately. Through analyzing the outputs of the experiment, this study obtains the characteristics of thinking contexts in interdisciplinary design teamsThis study concludes the thinking context features of the interdisciplinary design team which has sociology department members, and the features are as following1. The aspect of “Thinking Context”: The content of issues discussion from the interdisciplinary team is more profound but not with extensive contexts. In addition, due to non-design department members are not familiar with product development process, the ability of leading the discussion back to the main topic of industrial design department members is vital. Otherwise, it forms no avail communication.2. The aspect of “Thinking Viewpoint”: The interdisciplinary design team with psychology department members tends to explain human’s psychology and physiology status from sociology factors. However, the design team with single major background tends to understand one certain user group through personal physiology and psychology features. Therefore, it reveals that an interdisciplinary collaboration can break the fixed professional thinking context or frame and make the possibilities of problem solving become diverse.3. The aspect of “Interactive Communication”: The two different backgrounds’ members of interdisciplinary team have fine interaction and feedback in the aspects that are related to the profession of “physiology”, “psychology” and “users.” Among these aspects, the discussions come up with more practical meaning.Further related research in the future can apply this study as study basic to explore more interactive communication issues of concept collaboration from interdisciplinary design team continuously. It is expected to make design innovation paths become diverse and abundant.
Appears in Collections:	[工業設計學系所] 碩士論文

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
098THU00038002-001.pdf		450Kb	Adobe PDF	763	View/Open

Loading...