本論文第一章針對前人對濱田隼雄作品的分期做了整理，並明確表示先行研究與本論文所要論述方向之差異。本論文著重於探討當時政府對新聞媒體的政策對作家造成的影響以及濱田對台灣文學的看法。第二章第一節主要著眼於濱田隼雄於學生時代以及在東京從事記者工作時對社會抱持關心來進行陳述。第二節則提及濱田身為教師，在教書期間於《臺灣日日新報》中所發表的評論中，可看出濱田對學校考試制度的看法及關心學生的態度。第三節則藉由濱田在《文藝臺灣》所發表的評論中，得知處於大東亞文學一環的臺灣文學所擁有的重要性。第四節探討當時國家政策對新聞媒體的限制以及《臺灣日日新報》《文藝臺灣》與國家的關係，藉此陳明作家迎合國策的理由。 第三章進入濱田的作品分析，透過分析濱田的七個作品來陳述他作品裡頭教師這個角色所產生的糾葛。透過作品中來闡明教師在面對國家政策所產生的糾葛來看當時身為握有權力的人不得不協助國家的無奈以及對當時政策抱持不同看法的人民的聲音。 本論文結論為濱田作品中的教師像可分為不得不變成權力者及有責任幫助弱勢兩部分，濱田也因為當時檢閱制度很嚴格的緣故在迎不迎合國策上內心產生了糾葛。因此在探討日治時期作家所寫的作品時需考慮到作家因為當時受到政策影響的要素。 In the first part of this paper will put the other people’s statement about Hayao Hamada’s novel in order. At the same time , in this paper will make a distinction between the other paper’s and mine. I will focus on how’s the novelist influenced by the government’s media policy and what did Hayao Hamada think about Taiwanese literature.The second part of this paper will focus on Hayao Hamada’s university time and Tokyo’s life when he paid attention to the social. Moreover ,when Hamada did a teacher ,he contributed an article about the examination system of students’ to the[Taiwan Japanese newspaper]or[literary magazine of Taiwan] and concerned about his student. Furthermore,in this paper will express the statement about Taiwan literature above Asian literature. Finally ,I will focus on the policy of the government and the limitation of media to prove why the novelist put the same statement with the government.The third part of this paper will analyze Hamada’s novel to prove the inner conflict of Hayao Hamada. Furthermore, when I make the inner conflict between Hamada’s novel ,we can see the powerful people had not any choice but to cooperate to the government and the difference think between the government about the policy.
