English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 21921/27947 (78%)
Visitors : 4242923      Online Users : 783
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://140.128.103.80:8080/handle/310901/8765


    Title: 我國彈劾權之研究:理論與實際
    Other Titles: Study on Impeachment Power In R.O.C.:Theory and Practice
    Authors: 李慧雯
    Li, Hwei-Wen
    Contributors: 任冀平
    Jen, Chi-Ping
    東海大學政治學系
    Keywords: 彈劾權;懲戒權;懲處權;監察院
    Impeachment Power;Discipline Power;Administrative Disposition;The Control Yuan
    Date: 1999
    Issue Date: 2011-06-15T08:05:27Z (UTC)
    Abstract: 長久以來,監察院彈劾權行使的績效,備受各界質疑與嘲諷。何以其「祇拍蒼蠅,踩螞蟻,而不敢打老虎」?問題的癥結所在何在呢?四階段修憲後,我國彈劾權的行使規定產生重大變革。如此之變革是否能提振我國彈劾權的行使績效?這些問題皆是本篇論文的研究重點。 為了探求問題的核心,本篇論文主要是以我國彈劾權之理論基礎、制度設計與實際行使情形為研究主軸,透過層層推演分析,以瞭解三個層面之間的關連與相互影響關係;其間尚參照歐美民主國家彈劾權之理論基礎、制度規定及實際行使情形,透過二者之間的比較分析,凸顯我國憲政體制下彈劾權行使績效不彰之問題癥結,並就此提出改革之道,希冀能治本以正之。 研究結果發現,我國彈劾權行使績效不彰的問題癥結,在於其理論定位一直未能回歸到政治性權力的本質。因為從制憲到四階段修憲,代表們皆受孫中山先生彈劾權理念之影響,而將彈劾權視為懲戒官吏違法失職行為的一項行政性權力,類同於檢察官的起訴權。而始終未將彈劾權的行使限定在訴究政務官與法官違法濫權的行為上,使在政治上不適任者得以去職。因此,可以預見的是,四階段修憲後我國彈劾權的行使績效依然是不彰顯。至於改革之道,乃是重新檢討我國彈劾權的理論基礎,並參酌歐美民主國家彈劾權之理論基礎與制度設計,使彈劾權成為一項屬於議會的政治性權力。
    For a long time, people have been querying and sneering at the ineffectiveness and injustice of Control Yuan exercising impeachment power in R.O.C. What is the crux of the matter? After the four stage of Constitution amendment, articles about impeachment power have several important changes. Can these changes raise the effects of Control Yuan when exercising impeachment power? These issues are the key point of this thesis wants to study. To find out the crux of this subject, this thesis is separated into three parts: the theoretical foundation, institution design, and practice situation of impeachment power in R.O.C. as the spindles. With progressive analysis, we can investigate and understand the relationship between the three dimensions. And in the process, the thesis will also refer to the theory, institution, and practice situation of impeachment power in U.S.A. By contrast with the two systems, we can realize and explore why impeachment power takes no effects under our Constitution frame. Besides that, the thesis will also provide the advanced methods to be the root for effecting a permanent cure. According to the research, the crucial reason why impeachment power takes no effects lies in the characteristic of nonpolitical power in R.O.C. Both of the framers and the revisers in the National Assembly are under the influence of Dr. Sun Yat-sen ''s impeachment power ideal. The representatives regard impeachment power as an administrative power in punishing illegal and neglectful officials, exactly the same as prosecuting power of a prosecuting attorney. Furthermore, they haven''t limited impeachment power to attack illegal and neglectful government officials and judges, and make them no longer hold the post. Therefore, we can anticipate that the effects of exercising impeachment power in R.O.C. will be unapparent or ineffective. The advanced method is to make use of impeachment power becoming one of political powers of Congress.
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系所] 碩博士論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML247View/Open


    All items in THUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    本網站之東海大學機構典藏數位內容,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback