| Abstract: | 軟性顯示器的技術目前仍處於研發階段，其技術原創性較高，若能有效掌握專利佈局的優勢，除了深耕技術之外，更可以保護未來國內量產的自主性，因此在專利的相關研究上，詳細蒐集以及整合國內相關專利資訊並且針對關鍵性技術進行評估，可讓國內具備原創性專利的廠商有更進一步的發展。本研究在此將進行軟性顯示器產業與專利資訊的介紹，並探討基於專利指標的概念，擬出合作夥伴評選之方法，首先介紹軟性顯示器產業現況之發展，以OLED領域為研究主軸，透過整理OLED領域的文獻介紹，我們將軟性顯示器分成以下三個面向探討-材料、製程、設備，以便了解各階段所遇到的問題及合作研發的必要性。在專利資訊的文獻中，根據國內外學者相關的研究發現，如果只用專利產出數量來作為專利指標評估並無法正確反應產業技術現況及企業研發能耐，因此， 本研究整理過去國內外學者發表的文獻資料，根據他們所定義的專利一般特性分類、依專利引用分類、依專利之技術特性分類等三種分類所包含的專利指標，進行兩階段的問卷發展，依序請專家提出可能考量的專利指標，以及利用層級分析法評選出權重大小。本研究結果歸納出：OLED領域的專家一致認為在評估選擇協同合作夥伴時，專利指標的重要程度依序是製程之技術佔有率高於製程之技術強度，製程之技術強度高於材料之專利品質，材料之專利品質高於製程之技術優勢，製程之技術優勢高於材料之技術優勢等五項指標。
Flexible display technology is still in development stage. Its technical originality is higher. If we can control the patent effectively of the advantages, we can protect the future autonomy of domestic production. The patent-related research detailed collection, integration of related domestic patent information, and technology for critical assessment with the original patent can help us have further development for the domestic manufacturers.In this study, we will introduce flexible displays industry and patent information, and to explore the partner selection method by patent indicators. The first, we will introduce the flexible display industry, and the status of development. The second, according to some literature in OLED field, we will divide OLED into the three flexible displays for the study - materials, manufacturers, equipments. We can understand the various stages of development problems and the need for cooperation.From the literature for patent information, some domestic and foreign scholars found that if we only use the number of patents as patent indicators of output, we can’t properly assess the status, and it can’t response the true industrial R & D capability. Therefore, according to the past literature from domestic and foreign scholars, there are some patent indicators classifications by general characteristics, patent citations, and technical characteristics. According to the three classifications, we will develop two-phase questionnaire. We will invite experts to consider the sequence of patent indicators, and use AHP analysis to select the better patent indicators.OLED experts agreed that we can select the collaborative partners in the assessment of options by patent indicators. The importance of the order of patent indicators is that technology share of manufacturers is better than technology strength of manufacturers, technology strength of manufacturers is better than patent quality of materials, patent quality of materials is better than technical superiority of manufacturers, technical superiority of manufacturers is better than technical superiority of materials. |
