Abstract: | 公務人員待遇調整議題,長久受政治、經濟與輿論等因素的影響,公務人員待遇調整並無明確依據,在法律層面上,公務人員待遇調整法令僅以『全國軍公教員工待遇支給要點』為依據,而公務員待遇調整涉及國家預算支出,金額不可謂之不大,豈能祇以行政規則實行。另外,在經濟層面,近來公務人員待遇未調整之原因似乎皆以國家財政窘困為由,而顯少考慮其他相關因素(如物價指數)。故本研究為使公務人員待遇調整相關問題受到重視,並希望能儘快得到解決方案。 公務人員待遇調整時常受到輿論或執政黨反對的原因,主要是公務人員待遇調整尚存有被質疑之處。如在公務人員待遇調整因素上,究應以何者為待遇調整考量因素?考量因素優先順序為何?及各官等待遇調整比率是否該一致?本俸(年功俸)和加給考量因素應相同嗎?又在待遇調整程序上,如公務人員參與待遇審議委員會組織之可行性,或是由公務人員協會派代表參與?公務人員待遇調整資訊公開的程度為何?公務人員調整之時機應為何?等問題仍待釐清。 本研究以次級資料及問卷調查方式進行,針對次級資料方面,係由行政院人事行政總處、中華民國統計資訊網、財政部統計處和勞動部之網站及行政院勞工委員會勞動統計年報、行政院主計處之國民所得年刊、中華民國臺灣地區社會指標統計與銓敘部之銓敘統計年報取得公務人員待遇調整相關資料,另外,再加上我國總人口數、公務人員人數、基本工資及失業率等,分析其對公務人員待遇之影響;另外以問卷調查之方式,以獲取公務人員對待遇調整上述相關問題的看法。 研究結果發現,公務人員待遇調整幅度並未依民間薪資水準(工業及服務業)、消費者物價指數與上一年比較變動情形、平均每人GDP、經濟成長率等因素做考量,與消費者物價指數與上一年比較變動情形雖有顯著關聯性且呈正相關,但解釋力並不強,另外,政府財政因素以全國賦稅實徵淨額總計為變項分析,亦與公務人員待遇調整幅度呈現負相關,故公務人員待遇調整應有其他因素之干擾。在公私部門薪資影響關係上,研究發現除失業率及基本工資外,私部門薪資對公部門無影響力,而公部門待遇調整對私部門薪資稍有影響但並不高,若想要以私部門薪資影響公部門待遇,應實際依各經濟指標、國民所得及政府財政等相關因素,做為公務人員待遇調整之指標變項。 其他在公務人員待遇調整內容上,其程序及資訊應以公平、公開之方式,摒棄過去黑箱作業方式,不但可去除民眾心中之疑問,使公務人員待遇調整能發揮激勵效果。 The salary adjustment issue of public servants has been affected by politics, economy, and public opinions for a long time. The basis for the salary adjustment of public servants is still undefined. In the legal level, the salary adjustment of public servants is based on "the supply method of the salary adjustment of public servants." Nevertheless, the salary adjustment of public servants consists of the account budget of one country, and the sum of that budget. The amount of the budget is quite huge. So it should not be implemented by only an administration order. In addition, in the economy level, recent pending salary adjustment of public servants seems to result from the financial constraints of the government, but it is not considered from other factors like price index. Therefore this study pays closer attention to the salary adjustment issue of public servants, and trys to find solutions as soon as possible. The objections from public opinions and authorities about the salary adjustment of public servants are the existing questions on salary adjustment. In salary adjustment factors at public servants level, for instance, which ones should be the considered factors? Which considered factors are the priority? If the salary adjustment rates of each public servant level should be consistent? Should the considered factors between salary and allowance be consistent? Should the participants in the salary adjustment procedure meeting be public servants themselves or from the association representatives of public servants? How open to the public should the salary adjustment information be? When is the timing for the salary adjustment? And other issues should also be clarified. This study is proceeded by secondary data and questionnaires. In secondary data, It refers to Directorate-General of Personnel Adminstration Excutive Yuan, National Statistics R.O.C., Data Department of Ministry of Finance and Minstry of Labor Website, as well as Labor Committee of Excutive Yuan annual report, the national income annuals of The Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) of Executive Yuan, Republic of China Taiwan social pointers statistics and civil service statistics of the Ministry of personnel report Achieved Adjustment in salaries of civil servants Data. In addition, coupled with our country population, the people of public servants, basic wages and unemployment rates, analyize the effects on the salary of public servants. Furthermore the questionnaires are to obtain the opinions of public servants for salary adjustment. The study results show the salary adjustment range of public servants is not in accordance with private enterprises salary adjustment level (industry and services), the consumer price index (CPI) compared with the previous year variable rates, The average per capita GDP, and economic growth rate factors considered. Although the salary adjustment range is significantly positive correlated with CPI as well as last year CPI rate of change, the explanation power is less strength. Furthermore, government finicial factors relys on nationwide tax net levy being a variable analysis, and also is significantly negative correlated with the salary adjustment range of public servants. The salary adjustment of public servants, to be more specific, should be interfered by other factors. In public-private sector salary effect relationships, research found public sector salary is no influence from private sector salary except unemployment rates and basic salary. Conversely, public sector salary adjustment has slightly influence on private sector salary, but not heavy. If private sector salary want to affect public sector salary, it should be in reality according to the economic index, people's income and government financial situation related factors as being pointer variable items of salary adjustment of public servants. Additionally, the content procedures and information in salary adjustment of public servants should be fair and open. It should get rid of uncover method in the past. This way can not only remove people doubts, but also achieve the incentive effects for the salary adjustment of public servants. |